Legal Opinion

Hill v. Conroy Bros. Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 1975No. 45071PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Todd, Justice.

Relators seek review of a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission awarding benefits to respondent. They contend that the commission abused its discretion in vacating the original award of benefits and that the commission’s finding that respondent is permanently and totally disabled is unsupported by the evidence. We affirm.

Respondent sustained injuries to his lower back at work on April 9, 1966, and October 17, 1966. On September 11, 1967, he was awarded benefits for 104 weeks of temporary total disability and for a 30-percent permanent partial disability of the back.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mattson v. AbateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. Elsenpeter v. PotvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Strei v. Church of St. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Radzak v. Mercy HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Prucka v. Papio Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Westendorf v. Campbell Soup Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Gose v. Monroe Auto Equipment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Gose v. Monroe Auto Equipment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Hill v. Conroy Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API