Prucka v. Papio Natural Resources District
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Krivosha, C. J:
This is an appeal by Papio Natural Resources District from an order of the District Court for Sarpy County, Nebraska, allowing attorney’s fees and costs to the appellees, Frank H. Prucka and Mar garet Prucka, husband and wife. For reasons more particularly set out in the opinion, we affirm the judgment of the trial court in allowing such attorney’s fees and court costs.
Papio commenced an eminent domain proceeding in the county court of Sarpy County, Nebraska, seeking to acquire certain property of the Pruckas located in Sarpy County. The board of appraisers awarded damages in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Iske v. Metropolitan Utilities District of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Pieper v. City of ScottsbluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- Jensen v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF ROADSNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
- Schimonitz v. Midwest Electric Membership Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Hughes Farms, Inc. v. Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Lane v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- Vella v. HudginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Wear v. State, Dept. of RoadsNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Marriage of McNeillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.