Gose v. Monroe Auto Equipment Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentLevin, J.
The doctrine of res judicata bars relitigation of a claim or issue previously adjudicated.
In a prior separate proceeding, in Gose, it was determined that he was not entitled to compensation for loss of the industrial use of his legs. The question now presented is whether this petition seeking compensation for incurable insanity is barred by the earlier determination because both efforts to obtain compensation seek to enforce the same claim of total and permanent disability.
In Sanders it was previously determined that she had not established permanent and total loss of the industrial use of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DuelSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hlady v. Wolverine Bolt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Van Dorpel v. Haven-Busch Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Verberg v. Simplicity Pattern Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.