Legal Opinion

Roberts v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 2000No. 96-CF-1092PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Before STEADMAN, SCHWELB, and RUIZ, Associate Judges.

ORDER

2Per curiam

In consideration of the opinion by the court in Roberts v. United States, 743 A.2d 212 (D.C.1999) (Roberts I), the appellant’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, the appellee’s opposition to the petition, and the record herein, it is now hereby

ORDERED by the merits division that the petition for rehearing is granted in part and that the opinion in Roberts I is modified as reflected in the division opinion on rehearing issued this date (Roberts II); and the petition for rehearing, in all other respects, is denied. It is

FURTHER…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roberts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Olafisoye v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Lazo v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Marshall v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Darweshi McRoy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. United States v. SilvaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API