Legal Opinion

Roberts v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1999No. 96-CF-1092PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWELB, Associate Judge.

Edward Cheeseman Roberts was convicted by a jury of one count of carnal knowledge of a child under sixteen years of age and one count of rape, both in violation of D.C.Code § 22-2801 (repealed 1995). 1 On appeal, Roberts contends that the indictment on which he was brought to trial was unconstitutionally Vague and that the prosecution’s evidence constructively amended the allegedly defective indictment. Roberts also claims that the trial judge committed plain error by fading, sua sponte, to preclude the prosecutor from cross-examining Roberts on the subject of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Roberts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. McClam v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
  5. People v. CruzSuperior Court of Guam · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API