Legal Opinion

Bombardi v. Pochel's Appliance & TV Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 19, 1973No. 831-2PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

We previously filed an opinion in this case on October 16, 1973. Bombardi v. Pochel’s Appliance & TV Co., 9 Wn. App. 797, 515 P.2d 540 (1973). There we affirmed the judgment of the trial court in favor of plaintiff Mrs. Bombardi for damages to her rental property, and in favor of plaintiffs Messina for personal injuries and property loss. The damages were sustained as a result of a fire occurring in Mrs. Bombardi’s duplex, which was being occupied by the Messinas.

Since filing our prior opinion, we have reviewed a petition for rehearing or modification, a supplemental brief in support of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dunham v. Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Heaton v. Ford Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Farr v. Armstrong Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Ginnis v. Mapes Hotel CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Myrlak v. Port Auth. of NY and NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. Farmer v. International Harvester CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Gammon v. Clark Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Winters v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Cornell Drilling Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API