Legal Opinion
Adorjan Newman & Co. v. Richelieu Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 14, 1948No. Civ. 46-512PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
KAUFMAN, District Judge.
Motion by defendants to dismiss the complaint and for summary judgment in an action brought for a declaratory judgment that certain patents are void and were not infringed by plaintiff.
Both branches of the motion are based on the claim that defendants never gave plaintiff notice of infringement, and consequently, that there is no “actual controversy” between the parties within the meaning of the Declaratory Judgment statute, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2201.
Defendants contend that such notice as was given by defendant, The Richelieu Corporation, was given to Novel Products Company…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. American Anode, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- E. Edelmann & Co. v. Triple-A Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Treemond Co. v. Schering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Aralac, Inc. v. Hat Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation (No. II)District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1984