Legal Opinion
In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation (No. II)
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided December 20, 1984No. MDL 574PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
McMILLAN, District Judge.. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. These fifteen actions for patent infringement were consolidated here for pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 by means of orders entered by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on December 2 and December 8, 1983, and January 16, 1984.
2. The plaintiff in all fifteen actions is Lex Tex Ltd., Inc. (“Lex Tex”), a patent holding company which was incorporated in Florida and which owns the patent in suit by reason of an assignment dated April 28, 1970, from a North Carolina corporation named…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- General Talking Pictures Corp. v. Western Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Chore-Time Equipment, Inc. v. Cumberland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- David Leinoff v. Louis Milona & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Advanced Hydraulics, Inc. v. Otis Elevator CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Amsted Industries Incorporated, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Buckeye Steel Castings CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- American Medical Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Medical Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Wafer Shave, Inc. v. Gillette Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
- MGA, INC. v. Centri-Spray Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986
- Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.