Legal Opinion
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 6, 1944No. 12466PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The petitioners, pursuant to § 19(b) of the Natural Gas Act,1 seek a review and reversal of an interim rate reduction order made by the Federal Power Commission on September 23, 1942. The case was argued and submitted at the May, 1943, term of this Court. Decision was deferred awaiting the determination by the Supreme Court of the United States of the cases of Federal Power Commission et al. v. Hope Natural Gas Company, and City of Cleveland v. Hope Natural Gas Company. After the opinion in those cases was rendered (January 3, 1944, 320 U.S. 591, 64 S.Ct. 281), a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Davenport Water Co. v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- State Corp. Commission of Kan. v. Federal Power Commission. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.