Legal Opinion

Cook v. Bishop

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 1, 1988No. 62586PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLIN, Chief Justice.

Tom Cook, Firehole Oil Co., Firehole II, Inc., J. Tate Hale, Jim Black Children’s Trust, and the Statman Co., [investors] brought an action for rescission under the Oklahoma Securities Act, 71 O.S.1981, §§ 1-501, for sale of unregistered securities involving fractional oil and gas working interests sold by Larry G. Bishop and Bishop Royalty, Inc. [issuer]. The issuer answered inter alia that the investors were knowledgeable, sophisticated, and had been engaged in oil and gas exploration for many years; the interests sold were exempt from registration under 71 O.S.1981, §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buckner v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Mayfield v. H.B. Oil & GasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Lambrecht v. BartlettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Petroleum Resource Development Corp. v. State Ex Rel. DaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Union Oil Co. v. Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Edwards v. UriceCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
  3. Graybeal v. Martin Sand & GravelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. Union Oil Co. v. Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API