Legal Opinion
Doe v. Luzerne County
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 12, 2011No. 10-3921PublishedCited by 197 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Jane Doe, a deputy sheriff in the Luzerne County Sheriffs Department (the “Department”), brought this action against appellees Luzerne County (the “County”), Ryan Foy, who was a deputy chief for the Department at the time of the events at issue, and Barry Stankus, who was the sheriff of Luzerne County also at that time (collectively, the County, Foy, and Stankus are “County Defendants”). Doe sought remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and claimed, among other things, that County Defendants violated both her federal constitutional right to privacy under…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by197 opinions
- Estate of Adriano Roman, Jr. v. City of NewarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Lawrence Thomas v. Cumberland CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Mary Burton v. Teleflex IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Byron Halsey v. Frank PfeifferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Paula Jensen v. Pressler & PresslerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
192 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.