Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Applied Materials Corporation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 8, 2021No. 5:20-cv-06007Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 KEVIN F. JACKSON, Case No. 20-cv-06007-VKD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 10 v. COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAYING ACTION 11 APPLIED MATERIALS CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 29 12 Defendants. 13 14 Plaintiff Kevin Jackson filed this Title VII action against his former employer, Applied 15 Materials Corporation (“Applied Materials”), and its Managing Director of Human Resources, 16 Keith Dupen. Dkt. No. 1. Defendants now move to compel arbitration pursuant to Mr. Jackson’s 17 employment…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API