National Fire Insurance v. Banister
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Townsend, Presiding Judge.
1. Pleadings are to be given a reasonable intendment, and a strained and unnatural construction will not be given them in order to raise an inference against the pleader. Where, as here, it appears that the plaintiff carried a policy of fire insurance on a described house and contents, an allegation as follows: “. . . de fendant insured plaintiff for the period stated in said policy of insurance against loss by fire of the building and contents belonging to plaintiff; said building and contents owned by plaintiff and described in said policy being a brick veneer…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. PekorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Atlanta Title & Trust Co. v. Allied Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- GEORGIA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY v. PincusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Firemen's Insurance v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Wallace v. BrannenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ford Motor Company v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Sarno v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- American Casualty Co. v. Parks-Chambers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Northeast Factor & Discount Co. v. Mortgage Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Banister v. NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORDCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.