Legal Opinion

National Fire Insurance v. Banister

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 22, 1961No. 38899PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Presiding Judge.

1. Pleadings are to be given a reasonable intendment, and a strained and unnatural construction will not be given them in order to raise an inference against the pleader. Where, as here, it appears that the plaintiff carried a policy of fire insurance on a described house and contents, an allegation as follows: “. . . de fendant insured plaintiff for the period stated in said policy of insurance against loss by fire of the building and contents belonging to plaintiff; said building and contents owned by plaintiff and described in said policy being a brick veneer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. PekorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Atlanta Title & Trust Co. v. Allied Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  3. GEORGIA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY v. PincusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  4. Firemen's Insurance v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  5. Wallace v. BrannenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Company v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  2. Sarno v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. American Casualty Co. v. Parks-Chambers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Northeast Factor & Discount Co. v. Mortgage Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Banister v. NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORDCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API