Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Company v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 16, 1963No. 39915PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ebbrhardt, Judge.
Ford contends its last general demurrer should have been sustained because a general demurrer to the original petition was sustained and thus became the law of the case. The procedural history of the case begins with the filing of the original petition in two counts on November 18, 1959. General demurrers to both counts, as well as duplicity and misjoinder demurrers, were sustained with 30 days granted to amend. After that order, plaintiff amended within the 30 days allowed and four times thereafter. On each occasion, Ford demurred or renewed its demurrers. Finally on July 6,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Pavesich v. New England Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Brown v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Metter v. Los Angeles ExaminerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Nader v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Cabaniss v. HipsleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Melton v. LaCalamitoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- A-1 Bonding Service, Inc. v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Peacock v. Retail Credit CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.