Legal Opinion
Northeast Factor & Discount Co. v. Mortgage Investments, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 2, 1963No. 40047PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
Did the form of the transfer here amount to a general indorsement, a special indorsement, or an assignment only?
While there is a hopeless conflict of authority as to the effect of a transfer in the form used here, the majority rule both before and after adoption of the Negotiable Instruments Law has been and is that the effect is that of a general or commercial indorsement. 8 Am. Jur. 254, Bills & Notes, § 546; Annot. 44 ALR 1354; Beutel’s Brannan, Negotiable Instruments Law, § 31, p. 601 (7th Ed. 1948); and see, Assignment on Back of Notes as Indorsement, 19 Cal. L. Rev. 324…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Tindall v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Robbins v. Welfare Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Haug v. RileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Harvey v. ZellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Vanzant, Jones & Co. v. Arnold, Hamilton & JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Matrix Properties Corp. v. TAG INVESTMENTSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Womack v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Clark v. S. F. C. Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- D.C. Micro Development, Inc. v. BrileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.