Legal Opinion

Purdy v. Winters' Estate

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. On motion to dismiss appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. A judgment in a former action between these parties, rendered in favor of the defendants, was affirmed on appeal: Purdy v. Wmters’ Estate, 79 Or. 614 (156 Pac. 285). When the mandate went down the plaintiff commenced another action wherein the complaint set forth substantially the charges made in the former action. A demurrer to the complaint herein was sustained and the action dismissed without prejudice, from which latter judgment the plaintiff again appeals. Believing that the questions here involved have been fully…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Purdy v. Winters' EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Benson v. BirchOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Columbia Auto Works, Inc. v. YatesOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. State Unemployment Compensation Commission v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. CREDIT BUREAU, INC. OF GEORGIA v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Purdy v. Winters' EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API