People v. Hoffman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARONSON, J. *
Michael Shane Hoffman was charged by information with transporting and possessing methamphetamine after his motion to suppress evidence was denied by the preliminary hearing magistrate. Hoffman eventually pleaded guilty to the charges in exchange for three years of formal probation. He now seeks review of the magistrate’s ruling. We conclude, however, Hoffman has waived his right to appeal by failing to renew his suppression motion before the trial judge. We therefore affirm the judgment.
In People v. Lilienthal (1978) 22 Cal.3d 891 [150 Cal.Rptr. 910, 587 P.2d 706], our…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. LilienthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. WitcraftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. GarridoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. HindsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.