Legal Opinion
People v. Hinds
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 16, 2003No. C040999PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, J.
After the preliminary hearing magistrate denied his motion to suppress evidence, defendant Joshua Lynn Hinds entered a negotiated plea of guilty to one count of cultivating marijuana in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11358. On appeal, defendant seeks review of the magistrate’s ruling. We conclude that defendant has waived his right to appeal by failing to renew his suppression motion before the trial judge. We shall therefore affirm the judgment.
Background
On July 11, 2001, after a combined preliminary hearing and hearing on defendant’s motion to suppress…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. WitcraftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. GarridoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- P. v. Green CA5California Court of Appeal · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.