Legal Opinion

Dillon v. Meister

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1947No. Docket No. 57, Calendar No. 43,820PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCabe, C. J.

Plaintiffs herein, as heirs of James W. Dillon, deceased, brought suit in the circuit court for the cancellation of a warranty deed executed by Mr. I)illon as grantor to the defendant Susan Meister as grantee. The instrument in question was dated March 8, 1943, and purported to convey certain real estate in the city of Detroit, said property being an apartment building owned by the grantor. At the same time a second deed was executed by Mr. Dillon to his sister Margaret Dillon, one of the plaintiffs, in the form of a quit-claim conveyance of the grantor’s equity in a vacant lot. In May, 1943,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thatcher v. Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Andrew's ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Manistee National Bank v. SeymourMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Noakes v. NoakesMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Hynes v. HalsteadMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Barras v. BarrasMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lavean v. CowelsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1993
  2. Meister v. DillonMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Wandel v. WandelMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Weber v. FitzpatrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Ruecker v. GarvinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API