Legal Opinion

Slotnick v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 30, 1985No. 324-85CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:

The plaintiff, Army Air Force veteran Samuel Slotnick, appears in this action pro se1 seeking retroactive disability compensation for an allegedly defective 1949 veterans’ benefits determination. Plaintiff also alleges that due to the erroneous disability benefits determination, his medical treatment has been less than adequate, causing his condition to degenerate, for which he seeks an award for future medical care. Defendant, without addressing the merits of plaintiff’s claim, has asserted that plaintiff’s claims are…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Goewey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. Wayne State University v. Max ClelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kalick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Davis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  3. Kinne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  4. Caravella v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  5. Tapia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API