Legal Opinion

Homeland Insurance Company of New York v. CentiMark Corporation

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 29, 2021No. 3:15-cv-01745Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON HOMELAND INSURANCE COMPANY Case No. 3:15-cv-01745-JR OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. CENTIMARK CORPORATION, Defendant. RUSSO, Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Homeland Insurance Company of New York and defendant Centimark Corporation cross-move for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. All parties have consented to allow a Magistrate Judge enter final orders and judgment in this case in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 and 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). For the reasons set forth below, the parties’ motions are granted in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API