Legal Opinion

Smith v. Gaines

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 18, 1923No. 6 Div. 919PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

So far as the right of action is concerned, it is never neeessai’y for the plaintiff to have notified his warrantor of the breach of any of his covenants of warranty in a deed conveying real estate before bringing his suit for damages.

Such a notice to the warrantor, with a demand that he appear and defend a pending suit, is necessary if the warrantee would make an adverse judgment against himself in that suit conclusive evidence against his warrantor of the existence and superiority of the hostile title or incumbrance therein asserted, and necessary, also, if the plaintiff would recover of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dunklin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Chestnut v. TysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. Cover v. . McAdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Graham v. TankersleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  5. Rice v. CookMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank v. BonnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Fleming v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. McDowell v. HerrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Breeding v. RansomSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Edge v. BonnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API