Legal Opinion

Edge v. Bonner

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 19, 1952No. 6 Div. 367PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

Appeal was taken from a judgment transferring a suit at law to equity on the motion of defendant Bonner. Since an appeal does not lie from such an order (section 153, Title 13, Code), appellant, Edge has applied for a writ of mandamus in the alternative. Mandamus is the appropriate remedy. Ballentine v. Bradley, 236 Ala. 326, 182 So. 399.

No rule nisi has issued, but petitioner here seeks such rule. That remedy is available if he shows by his alternative petition that he has a prima facie right to such relief. Ex parte Tower Mfg. Co., 103 Ala. 415, 15 So. 836; Brazel v. New…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ex parte Tower Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Clark v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. CarlockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Fife v. Pioneer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Dinkins v. LathamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Merchants Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. Guaranty Funding Corporation v. BollingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Dominey v. MathisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. The Commercial Bank v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  5. Ex parte CurlSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API