McDowell v. Herren
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
The bill is to quiet title and charges that one Haynes is setting up a claim to or upon the land involved. The bill also avers that the complainant claims title under a deed from the Herrens and that Haynes claims under a lien or title against the Herrens prior to his said deed, The Herrens were therefore proper, if not necessary, parties to the cause, and the bill was not subject to demurrer as for improper parties. Smith v. Gaines, 210 Ala. 245, 97 So. 739.
The Herrens being the common source of title of complainant, and the title or claim of the principal respondent, they should be given…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilks v. WilksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Rosenau v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Brauer v. LaughlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Bromberg v. Eugenotto Construction Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Pond v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Huntsville v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Barran v. RodenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Holder v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- First Nat. Bank v. BonnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Amos v. ToolenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.