Farrar v. Holt
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.
The appellee instituted this suit to recover commissions in the sum of $277.77, alleged to have been earned by him for procuring a purchaser of appellant’s land. Appellee alleged, in substance, that appellant had listed his firm, consisting of 171 acres in Erath county, and agreed in writing that, if he should procure a purchaser, he (appellant) would pay to him, appel-lee, as commissions the said sum of $277.77. Appellee further alleged that a purchaser had been procured.
The appellant in answer to the petition pleaded, in substance, that the land for which the appellee was to negotiate a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Holt v. GordonTexas Supreme Court · 1915
- Stephenville, N. & S. T. Ry. Co. v. WheatCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Parker v. NaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Pope v. TaliaferroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Denman v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1946
- Perry v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Carnell v. KinserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Miller v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Taggart v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.