Legal Opinion

Farrar v. Holt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 12, 1915No. 8222PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.

The appellee instituted this suit to recover commissions in the sum of $277.77, alleged to have been earned by him for procuring a purchaser of appellant’s land. Appellee alleged, in substance, that appellant had listed his firm, consisting of 171 acres in Erath county, and agreed in writing that, if he should procure a purchaser, he (appellant) would pay to him, appel-lee, as commissions the said sum of $277.77. Appellee further alleged that a purchaser had been procured.

The appellant in answer to the petition pleaded, in substance, that the land for which the appellee was to negotiate a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Holt v. GordonTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Stephenville, N. & S. T. Ry. Co. v. WheatCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Parker v. NaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Pope v. TaliaferroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Denman v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Perry v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Carnell v. KinserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  4. Miller v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Taggart v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API