Seaboard Surety Co. v. Spear
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs below, and herein called plaintiffs, supplied lumber and materials to Arthur Storm Company, a Michigan corporation, herein called Storm, which contracted with the Government for the construction of certain buildings at four conservation camps in the State of Michigan. At the same time (1934) Storm had contracts with the Government for similar work at two camps in Illinois. Defendant, Seaboard Surety Company, herein called surety, was surety on the usual performance bonds furnished by Storm under the Hurd Act, 40 U. S.C.A. § 270, for each of the six jobs.
Final…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Jenkins v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Belknap Hardware & Mfg. Co. v. Ohio River Contract Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- Robertson v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- United States ex rel. F. B. Spear & Sons v. Arthur Storm Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
3Cited by4 opinions
- General American Life Ins. Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
- Anderson v. General American Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Abell v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Young v. PottsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947