Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. F. B. Spear & Sons v. Arthur Storm Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 10, 1939No. 7688PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal consolidated three suits upon contractors’ bonds. The appellee surety company, in compliance with Section 270, Title 40 U.S.C., 40 U.S.C.A. § 270,1 bonded the Storm Company, a Michigan corporation, as principal for the completion of *525contracts for the construction of public buildings at certain conservation camps in Michigan and in Illinois. The three contracts involved relate to the Michigan camps. Jury trial was waived in writing. The District Court after full hearing, dismissed the suits upon the ground that action had not been started within one year after…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Illinois Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. PeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Steacy-Schmidt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Consolidated Indemnity & Ins. Co. v. WA Smoot & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- United States ex rel. J. E. Sadler & Co. v. W. H. French Dredging & Wrecking Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1931
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. DahmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. BrookleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. SpearCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- United States ex rel. Bailey v. United Pacific Ins.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1954
- Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corporation v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.