Legal Opinion

Storr v. Central Bedding Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Issues of law upon demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

Asserting a contract whereby the defendant had agreed to pay royalties at a certain rate for each bed, manufactured and used or sold by it or by its licensees, embodying a patented device, and alleging that while some royalties are due.the amount is unknown to him, the plaintiff prays for an accounting and for specific performance of the contract, so far as the defendant had agreed to render semiannual statements of the beds manufactured and sold. Such a state of facts presents no case for an accounting (Moore v. Coyne, 113 App. Div. 52), and the breach of the agreement to render statements…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moore v. CoyneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Wynn v. Central Park, North & East River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Faherty v. FenderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  2. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. Green v. DunlopAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. Rice v. PetersNew York Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Sinkwich v. E. F. Drew & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API