Legal Opinion

Faherty v. Fender

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 28, 1983No. 82 Civ. 8667 (LFM)PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

MacMAHON, District Judge.

Defendant Harris R. Fender (“Fender”) moves, pursuant to Rule 12(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., for an order dismissing the complaint for lack of subject matter and personal jurisdiction. He also moves to dismiss on the ground that there is another suit pending between the parties for the same cause of action as that upon which the instant case is grounded. Alternatively, defendant requests that this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404.

Plaintiff, J. Roger Faherty (“Faherty”), is a…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  2. Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. McGowan v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. McKee Electric Co. v. Rauland-Borg Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1967

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. And Edwin Jay, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd. And Jack E. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. Ingersoll Milling MacHine Co. v. John P. GrangerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Thackurdeen v. Duke Univ.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  4. Business Trends Analysts v. Freedonia Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  5. Interface Biomedical Laboratories Corp. v. Axiom Medical, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API