Sinkwich v. E. F. Drew & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss an amended complaint, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice upon the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaint attempts to state two causes of action. The first cause of action is essentially a suit for the recovery of royalties, although other elements are pleaded. From the written agreements, appended to the complaint these facts may be gleaned. Plaintiff granted a license to defendant’s predecessor to manufacture and lease a patented machine, and an option…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schantz v. . OakmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Freeman v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Storr v. Central Bedding Co.New York Supreme Court · 1907
- Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Rice v. PetersNew York Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gersten-Hillman Agency, Inc. v. HeymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009