Bennett v. Misner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Oregon state prisoner Douglas B. Bennett appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of the Eighth Amendment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Beene *733v. Terhune, 380 F.3d 1149, 1150 (9th Cir. 2004), and we may affirm on any ground supported by the record, First Pac. Bank v. Gilleran, 40 F.3d 1023, 1024-25 (9th Cir.1994). We affirm.
Notwithstanding Bennett’s failure to support his contentions on appeal with argument or authority, we consider the district…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Raymond D. Jackson v. Duncan A. McIntosh David VictorinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Samuel Lemaire v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Samuel Lemaire v. Manfred Maass, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Robert Eugene Beene v. Cal A. Terhune James Nielson Roger Schaufel J.M. Widener, Parole AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
3Cited by6 opinions
- Adam Michael Wallace v. Mark Nooth, David Pedro, and Liza EmoryDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026
- Burke v. Aramark Correctional ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
- Byers v. VesterDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022
- King v. Aramark Correctional ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
- Lawson v. Aramark Correctional Services LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.