Legal Opinion
Samuel Lemaire v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Samuel Lemaire v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 23, 1993No. 91-35249, 91-35557PublishedCited by 491 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1447ORDER
Judge Trott’s majority opinion filed on July 21,1993, and refiled on August 13, 1993 with Judge Noonan’s amended dissent, is, with Judge Beezer’s concurrence, ordered amended as reflected in the attached Amended Opinion. Judge Noonan’s amended dissent filed August 13,1993 continues to apply to Judge Trott’s Amended Opinion.
With the Amended Opinion, Judges Beezer and Trott have voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the' suggestion for rehearing en banc. Judge Noonan has voted to grant the petition for rehearing and to accept the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by491 opinions
- Christopher Pyles v. Magid FahimCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Williams v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Frost v. AgnosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Hearns v. TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
486 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.