City of Scottsdale v. State
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CATTANI, Judge:
¶ 1 The City of Scottsdale appeals the superior court’s ruling that a state statute preempts a city ordinance imposing sanctions for sign walkers who conduct business on public thoroughfares, including sidewalks. For reasons that follow, we conclude that the state statute regulates a matter of statewide interest and preempts the municipal ordinance notwithstanding the City’s right — as a charter city under Article 13, Section 2, of the Arizona Constitution — to regulate matters of local concern. Accordingly, we affirm the superior court’s grant of summary judgment…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Strode v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- City of Tucson v. Arizona Alpha of Sigma Alpha Epsilon, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1948
- City of Tucson v. RineerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Levitz v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- Hogue v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Oak Creek v. SedonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025
- State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.