Legal Opinion

City of Scottsdale v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 30, 2015No. 1 CA-CV 14-0798PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CATTANI, Judge:

¶ 1 The City of Scottsdale appeals the superior court’s ruling that a state statute preempts a city ordinance imposing sanctions for sign walkers who conduct business on public thoroughfares, including sidewalks. For reasons that follow, we conclude that the state statute regulates a matter of statewide interest and preempts the municipal ordinance notwithstanding the City’s right — as a charter city under Article 13, Section 2, of the Arizona Constitution — to regulate matters of local concern. Accordingly, we affirm the superior court’s grant of summary judgment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Strode v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. City of Tucson v. Arizona Alpha of Sigma Alpha Epsilon, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. City of Tucson v. RineerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  5. Levitz v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Hogue v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. Oak Creek v. SedonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025
  4. State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API