Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Sand Mountain Electric Cooperative

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1958No. 7 Div. 498PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARWOOD, Presiding Judge.

The complaint in this case contained two counts.

Count 1 claimed damages because of defendant’s negligent failure to supply electrical current to his premises, as per agreement, the said failure proximately resulting in the loss of 450 broiling size chickens which smothered to death because the darkness caused by the interruption of the electrical service caused them to huddle or hover together.

Count 2 is substantially the same as count 1, except that it avers that plaintiff’s damages resulted from the defendant’s failure to restore the interrupted flow of electricity…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Birmingham Baptist Hospital, Inc. v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Magee v. BillingsleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
  4. Southern Ry. Co. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Leidholt v. District Court in and for City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Campen v. StoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Ryan v. AcuffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Keegan v. Grant County Public Utility District No. 2Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API