Legal Opinion
Rush v. Obledo
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 18, 1981No. C-79-2256-MHPPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATEL, District Judge.
This case raises the question whether the California state statutes and regulations permitting warrantless inspection of family day care homes violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The parties agree that there are no disputes as to material facts. The case is therefore before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The pertinent facts are stipulated or uncontroverted. Plaintiffs are: an operator of a licensed family day care home in San Mateo County, California 1 ; and an association of licensed family day care…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kathleen Rush, Eleanor Fraser and San Mateo County Daycare Association v. Mario Obledo, Secretary of California Health and Welfare AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Craib v. BulmashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Kim v. DolchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- State v. ZinmeisterOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- Pullin v. Louisiana State Racing Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.