Legal Opinion
Kim v. Dolch
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 23, 1985No. E001411PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRIS, P. J.
Plaintiff Tanya Kim petitioned the trial court for a writ of mandate declaring the newly enacted massage parlor ordinance of the City of Victorville to be unconstitutional. The petition for writ of mandate was denied.
On appeal plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in that: (1) the warrantless inspection clause of the massage parlor ordinance authorizes unconstitutional searches and seizures, and (2) the ordinance’s requirement of separate bathroom facilities for men and women is unconstitutionally arbitrary and discriminatory.
Facts
Plaintiff is the owner and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Terry York Imports, Inc. v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- 420 Caregivers, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. PaulsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Phillip Killgore v. City of South El MonteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Pinney v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.