Legal Opinion

Tursi Et Ux. v. Parry

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 1938No. Appeal, 308PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

This proceeding was begun by a bill in equity praying that the rights of the plaintiffs with respect to the use of a driveway, or alley, located between lands of plaintiffs and defendant be determined and that an injunction issue directing the removal of an obstruction placed in the alley by defendant. An answer and a replication were filed. The defendant denied that the plaintiffs had any legal rights in and to the alley and prayed that a decree be entered against plaintiffs restraining them from using any part of the alley in which the plaintiffs did not have ownership…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Paul v. CarverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  2. Cox v. FreedleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  3. Paul v. CarverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
  4. Caufman v. Presbyterian Congregation of Cedar SpringSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1813
  5. Andreas v. SteigerwaltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. SedwickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Justin J. Powell, Inc. v. WianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Cannon Brothers, Inc. v. D'AgostinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Beechwood v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. ForsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API