Legal Opinion

Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Forster

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 27, 1942No. Appeal, 228PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

This appeal involves a dispute between opposite abutting property owners over the use of a portion of an unopened city street.

In 1907 one William B. Haggart became owner of a tract of land lying south of Gates Street, in Boxborough, Philadelphia. Crossing this tract and intersecting Gates Street at right angles was Shalkop Street, which since 1885 has been designated on the city plan as a street fifty feet wide but has never been legally opened by the city. Haggart prepared a plan by which he divided the tract into fifty-eight numbered lots with streets…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. Phœnixville Bor.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  2. Gailey v. Wilkinsburg Real Estate Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. In re Opening of Brooklyn StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. Tesson v. Porter Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Neely v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones v. SedwickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Justin J. Powell, Inc. v. WianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Capozzi v. CumminsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Rubin v. Traurig, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API