Moss v. Pacquing
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, P.J.
In this products liability and medical malpractice action arising out of the use of the Cu-7 intrauterine device, we are asked to determine whether the trial court erred by granting summary disposition on the ground that plaintiff Tammy Moss’ claims were barred by the statute of limitations. MCR 2.116(C)(7). The court, having concluded that the statute of limitations barred Tammy Moss’ claim, further granted defendant summary disposition on plaintiff Dennis Moss’ claim for loss of consortium for failure to state a claim. MCR 2.116(C)(8). We reverse.
On April 22, 1979, following the birth of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Palenkas v. Beaumont HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Bonney v. the Upjohn CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Winfrey v. FarhatMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- Kelleher v. MillsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Leary v. RuppMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Berryman v. K Mart Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Al-Shimmari v. Detroit Medical CenterMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Long v. Chelsea Community HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Mascarenas v. Union Carbide Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gore v. Rains & BlockMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.