Legal Opinion

Reed v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 12, 1932No. 21619PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. “A surety who has paid the debt of his principal is subrogated, both at law and in equity, to all the rights of the creditor” (Civil Code of 1910, § 3567), and is entitled to recover from his cosurety (where there are only two sureties) half of the amount paid by him, *545with interest thereon and attorney’s fees, provided the debt paid by the surety was past due and the statutory notice of suit was given. See, in this connection, Civil Code (1910), § 3552; Youmans v. Puder, 13 Ga. App. 785 (80 S. E. 34).

Decided January 12, 1932. Hitch, Denmark & Lovetl, for plaintiff. Anderson, Gann & Gann,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hull v. MyersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Bigby v. DouglasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Train v. EmersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Youmans v. PuderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Todd v. WindsorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Harrison v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Bell v. KleinbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. Westbrook v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  5. Westbrook v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API