Legal Opinion

Train v. Emerson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 10, 1913PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Charlton. Chatham superior court. December 3, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, P. J.

Three of four sureties of an insolvent principal, who had paid the principal’s debt, sued the other surety to recover, on the note which contained the contract of indebtedness, one fourth of the amount so paid. The suit was brought more than four years after the payment, and within six years of the ma!urity of the note; and the question is whether the action is barred. If the suit is good as one on the note, then the-period of limitation is six years, and the sureties paying the note are not barred of their right to have contribution of their cosurety. On the other hand, if the plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hull v. MyersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Bigby v. DouglasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Sherling v. LongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Lumpkin v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bleckley v. BleckleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. First National Bank v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  3. Fender v. FenderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Todd v. WindsorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  5. Harrison v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API