Duncan v. Torney
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
An appeal by the plaintiff from an order taxing and disallowing costs claimed by plaintiff. The reason of the order was that a judgment entered in plaintiff’s favor was one which could have been rendered by the Municipal Court in the City and County of San Francisco.
The action was brought in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco to enforce a lien created by contract upon a judgment entered in respondent’s favor against defendant Petersen. The complaint, which was filed on February 14, 1930, alleged an express promise to pay as a contingent attorney’s fee…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re the Estate of FreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- East Bay Municipal Utility District v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Vanderbilt v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Williams v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. Allied Architects Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Petersen v. LydersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Doctors General Hospital of San Jose v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Rose v. Hertz Corp.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1985