Legal Opinion
Branum v. Burns
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 4, 1926No. 16046PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.
The plaintiff in error was defendant and the defendants in error were plaintiffs in the lower court, and for convenience they will be referred to herein as they there appeared.
The plaintiffs commenced this action to recover a balance alleged to- be due upon an open account which was itemized and attached to- their petition and which showed certain payments by the defendant, leaving a balance due of $718.92.
The defendant alleged that the goods furnished and the services rendered were not for an agreed price; that plaintiffs wero( entitled only to a reasonable price; that the charges made were'…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harrison v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. RardinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Oklahoma Hay & Grain Co. v. T. D. Randall & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- McCormick Harvesting-Machine Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Wilson v. WaldronWashington Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Reinhart & Donovan Co. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Gladys Belle Oil Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Miracle v. Barker Et Ux.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1943
- Black v. WickettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.