Legal Opinion

State v. Ramsour

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 15, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Indictment for carrying concealed weapons, tried at Fall Term, 1893, of LincolN Superior Court, before Mclver, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of Associate Justice Avery.

1Opinion of the Court

Avery, J.:

There is a conflict between the record proper and the statement of the case on appeal. The Judge states that the judgment was suspended after a trial and verdict of guilty, it being admitted that the offence was committed in December, 1892. From the record proper it appeared that no jury was empaneled, but that the defendant was brought to the bar of the Court and arraigned upon an indictment (in the usual form for carrying a concealed weapon) which was found on the 16th of October, 1893, whereupon the following entry was made: “ Motion by defendant to quash bill of indictment.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . KeeterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. Farmer v. . WillardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  3. State v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. . EstesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Corp. Commission v. Merchants BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. State v. . NorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. State v. . WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. State v. . DickensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API