American Employers Insurance Co. v. Coachmen Industries, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
Defendants-numerous insurance companies-appeal the trial court's granting of Coachmen Industries, Inc. ("Coachmen") and Coachmen Industries of Texas, Inc.'s ("CIT") Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Choice of Law. 1 The dispute at the center of this interlocutory appeal centers upon whether, as advocated by Coachmen, the substantive law of Indiana or whether, as advocated by the defendant insurance companies, the substantive law of Texas should apply. The trial court determined that the substantive law of Indiana should apply. Because Indians is the state…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Dana Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Simon v. United StatesIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Recticel Foam Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Summit Corp. of AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- SCHAFFERT BY SCHAFFERT v. Jackson Nat. Life Ins. Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA. v. Standard Fusee Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Nautilus Insurance v. ReuterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. TroskyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Standard Fusee Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- In Re Marvine W. Alford TrustIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.