Legal Opinion
Nautilus Insurance v. Reuter
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 8, 2008No. 06-4019, 07-1400PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
After numerous small corporations submitted claims to Nautilus Insurance Company (“Nautilus”) for the insurer’s defense and indemnity for lawsuits the small corporations were facing, Nautilus sought a declaration that it did not owe such duties to the small corporations for the underlying claims. The insurance policies did not contain choice-of-law provisions; as a federal court sitting in Indiana, the district court applied Indiana choice-of-law rules to choose which state had the most intimate contacts with the contracts. After deciding that Indiana law governed the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Eby v. York-Division, Borg-WarnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Dana Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Maria Arlete Vaz Borralho v. Keydril Company, Key International Drilling Company, Ltd. And Key Perfuracoes Maritimas, Ltda.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- J. Richard Tanner v. Jupiter Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Ohio Citizen Action v. City of EnglewoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- CLC Creditors' Grantor Trust v. Howard Savings Bank (In Re Commercial Loan Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- In Re Vitamin C Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.