Legal Opinion

Dye v. Farm Mortgage Inv. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1934No. 1101PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

An amended complaint, held bad on demurrer, set up false warranty of the collectability of three $1,000 promissory notes purchased by plaintiffs from defendant. The false representations relied on as constituting the warranty were not primarily made by the defendant company. They were made in principal part by William T. Pierce and J. P. Slaughter in writing and were directed to the defendant. It adopted and passed them on to appellants in its transactions with them, which resulted in the purchase of the three notes.

Taking the allegations of the complaint to be true as…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Runkle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Simar v. . CanadayNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Smith v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  5. Schuchardt v. AllensSupreme Court of the United States · 1864

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. City Co. of New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API