Legal Opinion
Gleason v. Carlson
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 9, 1948No. Civ. No. 3252PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
I desire to set out the grounds on which I concur in the judgment of the court.
This is an action under Section 266 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 380, now 28 U.S.C.A. § 2281, to enjoin defendants, the Governor and Attorney General of the State of Kansas, from the enforcement of the restrictions contained in Sections 65-1201 and 65-1005, Kansas Statutes 1935, in so far as they apply to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs are licensed osteopaths under the laws of Kansas and bring this action for themselves and in behalf of all osteopathic physicians in Kansas. It is their claim…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- New York Rapid Transit Corp. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Watson v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Colgate v. HarveySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- H. P. Welch Co. v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Schneider v. LiggettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- Ussery v. Anderson-Tully Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1954
- State ex rel. Schneider v. LiggettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978