Legal Opinion

Ussery v. Anderson-Tully Co.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided June 9, 1954No. H-464PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEMLEY, District Judge.

This cause, commonly referred to by Court and counsel as the “Red Fork Point Case”, having been tried to the Court, 1 and the Court having considered the pleadings, exhibits, testimony and briefs, and being well and fully advised, doth hereby make and file herein the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Comment thereon, to wit:

Findings of Fact.

1. This is an accretion case involving title to more than four hundred acres of wild, unimproved and unenclosed land, locally known as Red Fork Point; the area in controversy is located on a peninsula bounded on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crow v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  2. Bryant v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1954
  3. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. TullyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  4. Kimble v. WilleyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1951
  5. Gleason v. CarlsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Langston v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. Kimble v. Anderson-Tully Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1955
  3. Albert Matthews, Geraldine Mattews, and A. L. Nuckols v. George McGee and Chicago Mill and Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  4. McGee v. MatthewsDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1965
  5. Lathall D. Langston v. Donald E. Johnson, Administrator of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API