City National Bank v. Gustavus
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Judge Hickman
delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.
The application of each party for writ of error was granted, resulting in the situation that each is both plaintiff in error and defendant in error. To avoid confusion we shall employ the designations of the trial court wherein Mrs. Gustavus was plaintiff and The City National Bank of Bryan was defendant.
In December, 1921, the plaintiff, a widow, residing in Ballinger, Runnels County, sent through the mail two checks to the cashier of the defendant bank, as cashier and not as an individual, for deposit to her…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kidder v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Goldstein v. Union National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- City Nat. Bank of Bryan v. GustavusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mesquite State Bank v. Professional Investment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1972
- Sears v. Continental Bank & Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1977
- Hodge v. Northern Trust Bank of Texas, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2001
- Walker v. Texas Commerce Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1986
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Farmers & Merchants Nat. Bank of NoconaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.